There's probably more
chance of my wedding reception venue being a fast food restaurant
than me going into space. Indeed, I can't ever say I've ever wanted
to strap myself into a metal tube and blast off into an environment
which wants to kill me in every way possible. Space may be a
fascinating and thrilling place and a space mission may be a
once-in-a-lifetime experience but, like a Somali cruise, I have no
desire to go on one. And, after seeing Gravity,
my mind has been solidly made-up.
Gravity stars
Sandra Bullock and George Clooney. It had a budget of $105 million
and was produced by Warner Bros. It is strange, then, that despite
these blockbuster credentials, the film seems to be a very personal,
intimate affair. Many are describing the film as a work of
science-fiction but, to me at least, there seems to be very little
fiction. In fact, there's not an alien to be seen anywhere. The plot
centres on medical engineer Ryan Stone (Bullock) on her first shuttle
mission and veteran astronaut Matt Kowalski who are the only
survivors of an accident during a space walk. The pair, out of
contact with Mission Control, must use all their determination and
skill to try and make it back to Earth in one piece.
In
many respects, this film has parallels with horror. I'm sure that
drifting endlessly in space, with no hope of rescue would be most
people's idea of a nightmare. From beginning to end, the film grabs
you by the throat and doesn't let go until the very end. You'll leave
the cinema feeling like you've been spun around in a washing machine
and beaten about the face. The tight camera shots which focus on the
actor's faces, framed by their space helmets is very claustrophobic
and instils a real sense of fear in the audience. Director Alfonso
Cuarón
(Children of
Men,
Harry Potter and
the Prisoner of Azkaban)
works masterfully with director of photography Emmanuel Lubezki to
reflect, on a technical level, the thematic and narrative elements of
the film.
The
average shot length must be close to four minutes and the camera
moves around with a fluidity and precision which makes the film very
engaging. It was almost as if the studio had actually sent up a film
crew into space. The special effects are breathtaking and I urge
everyone to see it in 3D. Yes, I know I have voiced my personal
dislike of 3D in the past but, when it is used in a film such as
this, with subject matter and a setting which lends itself to
stereoscopy (the arena of space), it is fantastic. Space has never
looked so stunning.
Sandra
Bullock's performance shines through and – whether you love her or
hate her – there's no denying that she is very assured in the role
and displays just the right balance between vulnerability and
defiance in the impossibly-desperate situation in which she finds
herself. Clooney...well, plays Clooney.
Alongside
all the technical wizardry and jaw-dropping special effects (which
are certainly ground-breaking), Cuarón's
direction constructs an involving and thoughtful film. The thematic
elements of the film will be the subject of much debate, partly due
to its striking visual imagery. Sandra Bullock floating, foetal-like
in an air lock or being umbilically tethered to Clooney during the
space walk will certainly provide food for many a Film Studies
student's essay. In many respects, the film's simplicity is born from
the technical brilliance: the effects are so well executed that they
become totally believable and you don't sit there wondering “I
wonder how they did that”. As far as I'm concerned, they did
do it.
Gravity
is
a tense and technically-wonderous film. Indeed, it is one of the best
of the year and will make you fall in love with cinema all over
again. It's one hell of a ride but hugely enjoyable and really rather
jaw-dropping. It isn't, however, going to do anything good for the
Space Tourist Board.
Clapperboard Rating: * * * * *
Clapperboard Rating: * * * * *
No comments:
Post a Comment