For my French A Level
speaking exam, I talked for fifteen minutes about the Cannes Film
Festival. I researched its history, knew my Official Selections from
my Parallel Selections and could have easily told you who won the
Palme d'Or in 1976 (it was Taxi Driver).
Ever since then, I've always wanted to go to the festival and rub
shoulders with the industry's great and good. Many established
critics, however, turn their nose up at Cannes as if it were a
corporate, shallow and self-aggrandising media circus and, actually,
it is. But the thrill of attending would be fantastic. Anyway, to the
point: Cannes critics are renowned for their vocal
approval/disapproval of a film and The Paperboy,
the new film from Precious director
Lee Daniels, received a very negative reaction last year. Strange,
then, that it isn't all that bad...
Loosely-based
on the novel of the same name by Pete Dexter, The Paperboy
is a very odd affair and
fluctuates between the bizarre and the downright strange. Set in the
sweltering summer of 1969, the film sees newspaper reporter Ward
Jansen (Matthew McConaughey) and his younger brother Jack (Zac Efron)
investigate a murder case which has resulted in an innocent man being
sentenced to death row. Throw in an over-sexed bottle blonde (played
by Nicole Kidman) and you've got a trashy thriller with a heavyweight cast list and plenty of atmosphere. Indeed, The
Paperboy does rather well in the
atmosphere department, somewhat at the expense of a forceful and
driving narrative. Daniels' direction was rather limp in propelling
the film along and allowed for too many seemingly irrelevant moments
to really grip the audience.
Every
frame of the film oozed cinematic heritage and looked as though it were photographed through a 1954 Leica camera, whilst some nice
editing techniques were used to great effect. The film's aesthetic
certainly contributed to its successes in terms of its trashy,
pot-boiler feel and I was impressed by Daniels' cinematographic
choices, even if his uneven narrative could have been strengthened.
The whole cast put in good performances, especially from Efron, who
has a face and a sensibility on screen which was perfectly suited to
the film's era. The highest compliment I can pay Efron is that, if he
were to pop up alongside Hoffman in The Graduate,
I wouldn't bat an eyelid.
The
road from the High School Musical franchise
has been a fairly uneventful one for Efron although it has taken time
for him to settle into his right type of role. The Paperboy
is the first film in which I've
been really impressed by him. The character of Jack is both troubled
and conflicted. Lounging around in his underpants and yearning for a
female prescence in his life, Jack is enigmatic, temperamental and
sensitive and Efron's performance was exceptionally well-judged. The
sexual tension with Kidman may raise a few eyebrows, and the less
said about that jellyfish
scene, the better. In more general terms, I felt that the dynamics
between McConaughey and Efron were very believable and the quiet
dreaming of Jack was a surreal but competently executed extra layer
to a very unusual film.
Tonally
confused but often startling, The Paperboy
is a strange and perplexing film of sexual desire, truth and family.
In many ways, I didn't like it. But there was something rather
intoxicating about the sweat, soft cinematography and dynamic
performances. It's not fantastic but it's far from uninteresting.
What do those Cannes critics know...?
Clapperboard Rating: * * *
No comments:
Post a Comment